Licensing

   Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:47:35 -0400
   Ben Okopnik ([57]LG Technical Editor)

     [Ben] OK, I've done my bit of research and rewrite, etc., etc., etc. -
     thank you, Rick and Jimmy, for contributing to my knowledge of the topic.

     If you readers think that discussion might be interesting to you, let us
     know. Most of the Gang here found it rather dry. -- Heather

     [Ben] I've decided that the OPL is a good license for us to stick with, as
     long as the optional stuff is not asserted; consequently, I've updated our
     <[58]http://linuxgazette.net/copying.html> page - it was a) in the "old"
     LG format and b) showed the draft version of the OPL. Both are now fixed.
     Starting with the next issue, the front page will now explicitly state

All content released under the Open Publication License v1.0 (options A and B n
ot applied)

     and the individual articles will be tagged with

Copyright © 2004, [author_name]. Released under the Open Publication license

     Comments, as always, are welcome.
            ____________________________________________________

[LG 101] mailbag #2 - Stephen Bint

   Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:22:35 +1000
   Peter Maxwell ([59]peter.maxwell from anu.edu.au)
   Question by gfa2c (gfa2c from gmx.net)

   Stephen Bint died in February. I wouldn't have known except that back then
   google turned up his sister's web log:

     [60]http://www.livejournal.com/users/smaoineamh/2004/02/27

   [61]http://www.livejournal.com/users/smaoineamh/2004/03/06

   Apologies is this is old news (after all you published the question 2 months
   ago) but I guess it is just possible that no regular Linux Gazette readers
   were able to help.

   -- Peter Maxwell

     We sorrow that he's gone, but he stuck to his principles. There's plenty
     to be said for that. -- Heather
     _________________________________________________________________

      This page edited and maintained by the Editors of Linux Gazette
HTML script maintained by [62]Heather Stern of Starshine Technical Services,
                       [63]http://www.starshine.org/ 
     _________________________________________________________________

   Published in Issue 104 of Linux Gazette, July 2004

   [64]Home  [65]FAQ [66]Site Map [67]Mirrors [68]Translations [69]Search
   [70]Archives [71]Authors [72]Contact Us

   [73]Home > [74]July 2004 (#104) > TWDT

   Tux

More 2 Cent Tips!

 See also: The Answer Gang's [75]Knowledge Base and the LG [76]Search Engine
     _________________________________________________________________

     * [77]a question about linker script
     * [78]Launching Firefox 0.9
     * [79]Checkinstall
     * [80]Periodic table of the operators
     * [81]"Remote" authentication with PHP
     * [82]Xserver spits Xclient hosts
     * [83]Fun game in 64 LoC
     * [84]Grokdoc
            ____________________________________________________

a question about linker script

   Ben Okopnik, Jimmy O'Regan, Philip O Brien ([85]The LG Answer Gang)
   Question by Liang Jun-Ming (helo54ljm from yahoo.com.tw)

   Dear Mr.Okopnik

   My name is Liang Jun-Ming,a student from Taiwan.

   I'm  suffering from a programming problem,I would very much appreciate
   receving an answer from you ! I wrote a testing program named hello.s , and
   a linker script named ldscript as follows:

                   See attached [86]liong.hello.s.asm.txt

   after " as hello.s -o hello.o" and "ld -Tldscript hello.o -o hello" I get an
   executable named hello.

   My question is: