the time.
I tried telling CMOS that there was no second drive because someone
suggested that method to get linux to recognize a larger drive, but my
drive is 3GB. I have DOS on a master drive and two linux partitions on the
slave drive, with one linux in each, and RAMdisk and loop versions in DOS
partitions.
I am able to mount the linux partitions when running from the RAMdisk or
loop versions and then switch to run linux on them:
mount /dev/hdb1 /mnt
chroot /mnt
This puts hdb1 on / and I can then use linux on the ext2 partition.
[Kapil] But this is essentially what most initrd-based start up procedures
do anyway! So, though I haven't used BasixLinux, I would guess that the
problem is with the start scripts on your ext2 partition in /etc/rcS.d or
some such.
This is a minor nuisance and I suppose I could put it in an rc file, or just
use the smaller version unless I needed the larger one.
I am writing out of curiosity - why are so many computers difficult to boot
with linux?
[Kapil] The glass could also be half full! Given the variety of hardware
that Linux runs on it is surprising that so many computers boot with it at
all. :-)
Is there a better fix for this one? Is there a better fix for the other
three besides installing Win98 DOS on them (and having to use a boot floppy
to defragment the DOS partitions after that) or rebooting with a Win98 boot
disk to go from DOS to linux?
I also have one Northgate 386 SX 20MHz 4.7MB RAM laptop which has no cursor
in linux. Cirrus video, 256K video RAM, mono VGA. The cursor is plain white
when used in color VGA. The computer in theory can output to a color monitor
in 800x600 resolution.
[Kapil] Is this with or without X? The question is not clear enough. Are
you in graphics mode or text mode?
Does laptop video treat software cursors oddly? A cursor appears when I use
a text editor. There is a cursor while booting to DOS and in DOS.
Another 386 with identical speed, RAM and video won't boot linux at all -
the screen goes black and I need to reboot. What might cause this problem?
[Kapil] Try booting with the additional option "vesafb=off". Some of the
older hardware may not respond well to being switched to graphic mode.
Thanks for your help a couple of years ago getting my first linux set up
to work with both TTL and VGA monitors.
On behalf of The Answer Gang, you're welcome... (/me turns to our Gentle
Readers) and anyone among our readership who'd like to jump in on the
problem (our header does say "...and You!" after all) is welcome to send
replies to you, and encouraged to Cc: tag (The Answer Gang) at
linuxgazette.net. -- Heather
____________________________________________________
Python conferences in the US and Europe
Sat Dec 18 16:26:34 2004
Mike Orr ([27]LG Contributing Editor)
Mike sent this to his local Python user group, and to our Answer Gang. I
think it's an interesting question, one all you pythonistas out there
might be willing to express an opinion about. Reply to
[28]tag@linuxgazette.net; Mike will let his pal know if we get some
reasonable statistics, and juicy replies may end up in a future mailbag.
-- Heather
I got an interesting call from a friend of mine, a PyCon regular who, as it
turns out, lives in Sweden. There's been a discussion on the PyCon list
about whether the $175 conference fee is too high, too low, or just right.
That got her asking me what would it take to get more Americans to present a
talk at EuroPython (in Sweden next July -- [29]http://www.europython.org)
and Python UK (in England next April -- [30]http://www.accu.org/conference),
and more Europeans to PyCon (in Washington DC next April --
[31]http://pycon.org). I thought I'd throw the question out to y'all for
ideas. Not everyone here is interested in Python, but the same thing applies
to Linux and other free software projects.
She said that she could guess why why not many American presenters would go
to Europe, but she wanted to ask somebody on this side of the pond in case
there were factors she wasn't aware of. I said the main problem for
Americans (besides the expense) is that most people only get two weeks'
vacation per year, so they have to use the time selectively. She asked why
that was, since in Sweden the minimum is six weeks and most people get nine.
I said I don't know, it's just a longstanding tradition. She asked why
people don't demand more. I said people are much more concerned about health
care, and more vacation time is lower in their priorities.
She said that for her, the main problem with coming to American conferences
is the expense. That seems to be outside our control since the conference
fee is minimal already, and we can't do anything about airfares or
accommodation fees. 'Course the falling dollar will help. :)
=2= |